Git & Delivery More detail B · Official guidance Platform: General

Squash Commit

Squashing combines the changes from several commits into one new commit, often with interactive rebase or a merge rule.

See how it works
You might call it Squash Commit

See how it works

Original worked exampleSquash Commit

Another example

Five private fixup commits together make one reviewed feature. Squashing keeps the final code difference and one clear message, but careless squashing can erase useful review or author history.

Main parts

  1. 01source commits
  2. 02combined diff
  3. 03new commit message

Use it when

Use this term when several unpublished commits make one logical change and their small-step history is not needed.

Do not use it when

Do not squash separate changes, shared history, or evidence needed for review and credit.

Name used in code

pick A + squash B + fixup C → A′

Before you ship

Before publishing, check the exact repository, branch, target, and diff. Keep unpublished work. Pass review and CI checks. Record conflict and data-loss risks, release order, traceability, recovery, and rollback.

Request you can copy

Outcome: Use Squash Commit to release or recover the change safely, with a clear record. User context: Five private fixup commits together make one reviewed feature. Squashing keeps the final code difference and one clear message, but careless squashing can erase useful review or author history. Delivery concept or operation: Squash Commit. Why it fits: Use this term when several unpublished commits make one logical change and their small-step history is not needed. Do not use it when: Do not squash separate changes, shared history, or evidence needed for review and credit. Delivery requirements: Name the code repository and target. List preconditions, changes, review and CI checks, conflict and data-loss risks, release order, and the rollback or recovery command. Repository safeguards: Keep unpublished work and a clear history. Do not run destructive steps without an explicit backup. Check the exact code diff and remote target before publishing. Acceptance criteria: Review the intended diff and pass all required checks. Keep the target version traceable. Practice failure recovery and keep published history clear. Evidence and limits (evidence boundary): It is official for that source. Other platforms or teams may use the term in another way. Unknowns to confirm: Repository, branch, team activity, release environment, approval owner, protected checks, and rollback target.

Check this request

Review the current use of Squash Commit. Definition: Squashing combines the changes from several commits into one new commit, often with interactive rebase or a merge rule. Release checks: Before publishing, check the exact repository, branch, target, and diff. Keep unpublished work. Pass review and CI checks. Record conflict and data-loss risks, release order, traceability, recovery, and rollback. Before changing code, report the evidence you found, gaps, severity, and the smallest safe fix.

B
How official is this term?

Official guidance

The named platform, framework, project, or expert group has an official guide for this term.

It is official for that source. Other platforms or teams may use the term in another way.

Scope
Git interactive rebase
Document status
stable
Checked on
2026-07-30

Evidence sources & scope

Authority source + Term reference · Git · stable git-rebase Scope: Git commit replay and interactive history editing Role here: Direct term reference Source covers: canonical name, definition, platform API, implementation, usage guidance

Copy it yourself

The browser could not copy this. Select the request below and copy it yourself.