AI Core C · Industry convention Platform: AI

Conversation History

Conversation History is earlier chat and useful state passed into later turns. It is often filtered or summarized.

See how it works
You might call it chat historymessage historydialogue context

See how it works

Original worked exampleConversation History

Another example

A travel helper keeps agreed dates and accessibility needs, drops old hotels, and asks before reusing preferences on another trip.

Main parts

  1. 01User intent and context
  2. 02Model or tool decision
  3. 03Grounded result and fallback

Use it when

Keep only history needed to continue. Explain saving, deletion, privacy, and summary rules.

Do not use it when

Do not replay endless history or keep facts known to be wrong. Never cross user or workspace boundaries or claim memory the system lacks.

Name used in code

ordered messages + summary + retention policy

Before you ship

Check the model and prompt versions, source data, versioned evaluation set, and measures. Verify links to evidence, tool permissions, privacy, common failures, decline-to-answer and fallback behavior, human review, monitoring, cost, speed, and rollback.

Request you can copy

Outcome: Use or evaluate Conversation History to make AI behavior measurable and tied to evidence. User context: A travel helper keeps agreed dates and accessibility needs, drops old hotels, and asks before reusing preferences on another trip. AI method or concept: Conversation History. Why it fits: Keep only history needed to continue. Explain saving, deletion, privacy, and summary rules. Do not use it when: Do not replay endless history or keep facts known to be wrong. Never cross user or workspace boundaries or claim memory the system lacks. AI requirements: Define the input and source evidence. Set model and tool permissions. Use versioned evaluation data and measures. Define failure, decline-to-answer, privacy, speed, and cost limits. Operational safeguards: Keep a clear trace and hide sensitive log data. Show users a safe fallback. Mark steps that need human review. Define how to roll back the model or prompt. Acceptance criteria: Record baseline and target measures on a versioned evaluation set. Test edge cases and hostile inputs. Verify fallback, monitoring, permissions, and rollback. Evidence and limits (evidence boundary): No single official standard controls the whole term. Its meaning may change across teams, platforms, or frameworks. Unknowns to confirm: Target task, model and version, evaluation owner, source data, risk limit, tool permissions, and production fallback.

Check this request

Review the current use of Conversation History. Definition: Conversation History is earlier chat and useful state passed into later turns. It is often filtered or summarized. Release checks: Check the model and prompt versions, source data, versioned evaluation set, and measures. Verify links to evidence, tool permissions, privacy, common failures, decline-to-answer and fallback behavior, human review, monitoring, cost, speed, and rollback. Before changing code, report the evidence you found, gaps, severity, and the smallest safe fix.

C
How official is this term?

Industry convention

People often use this term at work. The listed sources may support practice or limitations. They do not define every part of the term.

No single official standard controls the whole term. Its meaning may change across teams, platforms, or frameworks.

Scope
Conversational-AI convention
Document status
stable
Checked on
2026-07-30

Evidence sources & scope

Authority source · OpenAI · stable Prompt Engineering Scope: OpenAI models Role here: Helpful background, not a definition Source covers: canonical name, definition, usage guidance, avoidance guidance

Copy it yourself

The browser could not copy this. Select the request below and copy it yourself.